Burundi vs Kazakhstan: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)
Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) over time
- Burundi
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 258.94 billion constant LCU against 198.88 billion constant LCU in Burundi, a difference of 60.07 billion constant LCU.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.3 times Burundi's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Burundi ranks 8th and Kazakhstan ranks 5th of 46 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.00 billion constant LCU | 329.54 billion constant LCU | 282.54 billion constant LCU | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 80.21 billion constant LCU | 258.94 billion constant LCU | 178.73 billion constant LCU | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim), Burundi or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 258.94 billion constant LCU against 198.88 billion constant LCU in Burundi as of 2010.
- What is the difference in financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim) between Burundi and Kazakhstan?
- 60.07 billion constant LCU, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Kazakhstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2010.
- How do Burundi and Kazakhstan rank globally for financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim)?
- Burundi ranks 8th and Kazakhstan ranks 5th of 46 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Financial intermediation services which are implicitly charged in the form of either the difference between a reference rate and the interest rate actually paid to depositors, or the difference between the interest rate charged to borrowers and a reference rate. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.