Solomon Islands vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Solomon Islands
56,432 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
56,101 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Solomon Islands rank
157th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
158th

Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Solomon Islands
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
020.0k40.0k60.0k198020012023

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 56,432 current US$ per square kilometre against 56,101 current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 331 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Solomon Islands ahead.

Solomon Islands ranks 157th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 158th of 185 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Solomon Islands averaged higher in 3 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Solomon Islands Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 16,406 current US$ per square kilometre 7,071 current US$ per square kilometre 9,335 current US$ per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2000s 19,180 current US$ per square kilometre 16,382 current US$ per square kilometre 2,798 current US$ per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2010s 42,293 current US$ per square kilometre 38,443 current US$ per square kilometre 3,850 current US$ per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2020s 51,355 current US$ per square kilometre 51,510 current US$ per square kilometre 155.07 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Solomon Islands or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Solomon Islands, at 56,432 current US$ per square kilometre against 56,101 current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Solomon Islands and Tanzania, United Republic of?
331 current US$ per square kilometre, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Tanzania, United Republic of?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Solomon Islands and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Solomon Islands ranks 157th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 158th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Solomon Islands vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/solomon-islands/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/solomon-islands/tanzania/">Solomon Islands vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 10,484 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.