Mexico vs Thailand: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Mexico
748,636 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Thailand
747,175 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico rank
72nd
Thailand rank
74th

Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Mexico
  • Thailand
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119922023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 748,636 current US$ per square kilometre against 747,175 current US$ per square kilometre in Thailand, a difference of 1,461 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mexico ahead.

Mexico ranks 72nd and Thailand ranks 74th of 185 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 5 and Thailand in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Thailand Difference Ahead
1960s 9,264 current US$ per square kilometre 6,700 current US$ per square kilometre 2,564 current US$ per square kilometre Mexico
1970s 29,854 current US$ per square kilometre 22,951 current US$ per square kilometre 6,903 current US$ per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 69,055 current US$ per square kilometre 64,475 current US$ per square kilometre 4,580 current US$ per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 182,325 current US$ per square kilometre 164,986 current US$ per square kilometre 17,339 current US$ per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 372,858 current US$ per square kilometre 261,292 current US$ per square kilometre 111,566 current US$ per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 512,810 current US$ per square kilometre 562,747 current US$ per square kilometre 49,937 current US$ per square kilometre Thailand
2020s 589,228 current US$ per square kilometre 710,227 current US$ per square kilometre 120,999 current US$ per square kilometre Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Mexico or Thailand?
Mexico, at 748,636 current US$ per square kilometre against 747,175 current US$ per square kilometre in Thailand as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Mexico and Thailand?
1,461 current US$ per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Thailand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Thailand rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Mexico ranks 72nd and Thailand ranks 74th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Thailand: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mexico/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mexico/thailand/">Mexico vs Thailand: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 10,484 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.