Malta vs OECD members: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Malta
43.67 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members
1.43 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
5th
OECD members rank
5th

Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Malta
  • OECD members
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M197019962023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 43.67 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.43 million current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 42.25 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 30.6 times OECD members's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 5th and OECD members ranks 5th of 185 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta OECD members Difference Ahead
1970s 1.37 million current US$ per square kilometre 99,081 current US$ per square kilometre 1.28 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1980s 3.75 million current US$ per square kilometre 247,665 current US$ per square kilometre 3.50 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1990s 8.40 million current US$ per square kilometre 503,855 current US$ per square kilometre 7.89 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2000s 16.04 million current US$ per square kilometre 794,518 current US$ per square kilometre 15.24 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2010s 25.98 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.10 million current US$ per square kilometre 24.89 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2020s 37.19 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.31 million current US$ per square kilometre 35.88 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Malta or OECD members?
Malta, at 43.67 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.43 million current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Malta and OECD members?
42.25 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and OECD members?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Malta and OECD members rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Malta ranks 5th and OECD members ranks 5th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs OECD members: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/oecd-members/">Malta vs OECD members: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 10,484 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.