Malta vs North America: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Malta
43.67 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
North America
1.35 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
5th
North America rank
6th

Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Malta
  • North America
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M197019962023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 43.67 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.35 million current US$ per square kilometre in North America, a difference of 42.32 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 32.3 times North America's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 5th and North America ranks 6th of 185 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta North America Difference Ahead
1970s 1.37 million current US$ per square kilometre 79,881 current US$ per square kilometre 1.29 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1980s 3.75 million current US$ per square kilometre 196,998 current US$ per square kilometre 3.55 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1990s 8.40 million current US$ per square kilometre 359,890 current US$ per square kilometre 8.04 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2000s 16.04 million current US$ per square kilometre 620,437 current US$ per square kilometre 15.42 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2010s 25.98 million current US$ per square kilometre 893,184 current US$ per square kilometre 25.09 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2020s 37.19 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.21 million current US$ per square kilometre 35.98 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Malta or North America?
Malta, at 43.67 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.35 million current US$ per square kilometre in North America as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Malta and North America?
42.32 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and North America?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Malta and North America rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Malta ranks 5th and North America ranks 6th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs North America: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/north-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/north-america/">Malta vs North America: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 10,484 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.