Malta vs Netherlands: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Malta
43.67 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Netherlands
23.60 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
5th
Netherlands rank
7th

Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Malta
  • Netherlands
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M196919962023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 43.67 million current US$ per square kilometre against 23.60 million current US$ per square kilometre in Netherlands, a difference of 20.08 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.9 times Netherlands's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Netherlands ahead.

Malta ranks 5th and Netherlands ranks 7th of 185 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 4 and Netherlands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Netherlands Difference Ahead
1970s 1.37 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.09 million current US$ per square kilometre 717,020 current US$ per square kilometre Netherlands
1980s 3.75 million current US$ per square kilometre 4.17 million current US$ per square kilometre 421,612 current US$ per square kilometre Netherlands
1990s 8.40 million current US$ per square kilometre 8.30 million current US$ per square kilometre 93,806 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2000s 16.04 million current US$ per square kilometre 13.95 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.08 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2010s 25.98 million current US$ per square kilometre 18.11 million current US$ per square kilometre 7.87 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2020s 37.19 million current US$ per square kilometre 21.28 million current US$ per square kilometre 15.91 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Malta or Netherlands?
Malta, at 43.67 million current US$ per square kilometre against 23.60 million current US$ per square kilometre in Netherlands as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Malta and Netherlands?
20.08 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Netherlands?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Malta and Netherlands rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Malta ranks 5th and Netherlands ranks 7th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Netherlands: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/netherlands/">Malta vs Netherlands: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 10,484 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.