Macau, China vs Singapore: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Macau, China
632.45 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
294.43 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Macau, China rank
1st
Singapore rank
3rd

Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Macau, China
  • Singapore
0200.0M400.0M600.0M196119922023

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 632.45 million current US$ per square kilometre against 294.43 million current US$ per square kilometre in Singapore, a difference of 338.02 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Macau, China's figure about 2.1 times Singapore's.

Across all 42 years both countries report, Macau, China has been ahead every year.

Macau, China ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 3rd of 185 countries.

Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macau, China Singapore Difference Ahead
1980s 50.80 million current US$ per square kilometre 17.74 million current US$ per square kilometre 33.06 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
1990s 162.70 million current US$ per square kilometre 54.58 million current US$ per square kilometre 108.12 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2000s 198.19 million current US$ per square kilometre 98.95 million current US$ per square kilometre 99.24 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2010s 480.85 million current US$ per square kilometre 206.08 million current US$ per square kilometre 274.77 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2020s 596.21 million current US$ per square kilometre 254.87 million current US$ per square kilometre 341.34 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Macau, China or Singapore?
Macau, China, at 632.45 million current US$ per square kilometre against 294.43 million current US$ per square kilometre in Singapore as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Macau, China and Singapore?
338.02 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macau, China and Singapore?
42 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do Macau, China and Singapore rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Macau, China ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 3rd of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macau, China vs Singapore: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/singapore/">Macau, China vs Singapore: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 10,484 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.