Kazakhstan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Kazakhstan
61,027 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
56,101 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
155th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
158th

Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
020.0k40.0k60.0k199020062023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 61,027 current US$ per square kilometre against 56,101 current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 4,926 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 155th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 158th of 185 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 6,556 current US$ per square kilometre 7,847 current US$ per square kilometre 1,291 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 13,861 current US$ per square kilometre 16,382 current US$ per square kilometre 2,521 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 41,182 current US$ per square kilometre 38,443 current US$ per square kilometre 2,740 current US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2020s 49,672 current US$ per square kilometre 51,510 current US$ per square kilometre 1,839 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Kazakhstan or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Kazakhstan, at 61,027 current US$ per square kilometre against 56,101 current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Kazakhstan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
4,926 current US$ per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Kazakhstan ranks 155th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 158th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/tanzania/">Kazakhstan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 10,484 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.