Indonesia vs Rwanda: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Indonesia
448,359 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
486,919 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Indonesia rank
91st
Rwanda rank
89th

Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Indonesia
  • Rwanda
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 486,919 current US$ per square kilometre against 448,359 current US$ per square kilometre in Indonesia, a difference of 38,560 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Indonesia's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1967 it was Rwanda ahead.

Indonesia ranks 91st and Rwanda ranks 89th of 185 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 3,737 current US$ per square kilometre 5,683 current US$ per square kilometre 1,946 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 12,369 current US$ per square kilometre 16,130 current US$ per square kilometre 3,761 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 33,784 current US$ per square kilometre 56,026 current US$ per square kilometre 22,243 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 61,403 current US$ per square kilometre 60,909 current US$ per square kilometre 493.37 current US$ per square kilometre Indonesia
2000s 119,408 current US$ per square kilometre 112,821 current US$ per square kilometre 6,587 current US$ per square kilometre Indonesia
2010s 329,394 current US$ per square kilometre 303,740 current US$ per square kilometre 25,654 current US$ per square kilometre Indonesia
2020s 416,324 current US$ per square kilometre 424,143 current US$ per square kilometre 7,818 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Indonesia or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 486,919 current US$ per square kilometre against 448,359 current US$ per square kilometre in Indonesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Indonesia and Rwanda?
38,560 current US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Rwanda?
57 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 2023.
How do Indonesia and Rwanda rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Indonesia ranks 91st and Rwanda ranks 89th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Rwanda: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/rwanda/">Indonesia vs Rwanda: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 10,484 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.