IBRD only vs Korea: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

IBRD only
363,127 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Korea
12.80 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IBRD only rank
19th
Korea rank
16th

Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • IBRD only
  • Korea
05.0M10.0M15.0M196119922023

How they compare

Korea currently reports 12.80 million current US$ per square kilometre against 363,127 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only, a difference of 12.44 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Korea's figure about 35.3 times IBRD only's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Korea has been ahead every year.

IBRD only ranks 19th and Korea ranks 16th of 43 groups.

Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IBRD only Korea Difference Ahead
1960s 6,536 current US$ per square kilometre 39,405 current US$ per square kilometre 32,868 current US$ per square kilometre Korea
1970s 17,918 current US$ per square kilometre 211,417 current US$ per square kilometre 193,499 current US$ per square kilometre Korea
1980s 41,504 current US$ per square kilometre 830,108 current US$ per square kilometre 788,604 current US$ per square kilometre Korea
1990s 52,009 current US$ per square kilometre 2.97 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.92 million current US$ per square kilometre Korea
2000s 98,841 current US$ per square kilometre 5.95 million current US$ per square kilometre 5.85 million current US$ per square kilometre Korea
2010s 249,353 current US$ per square kilometre 10.16 million current US$ per square kilometre 9.91 million current US$ per square kilometre Korea
2020s 327,720 current US$ per square kilometre 12.36 million current US$ per square kilometre 12.03 million current US$ per square kilometre Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, IBRD only or Korea?
Korea, at 12.80 million current US$ per square kilometre against 363,127 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between IBRD only and Korea?
12.44 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Korea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do IBRD only and Korea rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
IBRD only ranks 19th and Korea ranks 16th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IBRD only vs Korea: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/korea-rep/">IBRD only vs Korea: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 10,484 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.