High income vs Malta: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

High income
1.01 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
43.67 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
High income rank
7th
Malta rank
5th

Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • High income
  • Malta
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M197019962023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 43.67 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.01 million current US$ per square kilometre in High income, a difference of 42.66 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 43.1 times High income's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

High income ranks 7th and Malta ranks 5th of 43 groups.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade High income Malta Difference Ahead
1970s 102,524 current US$ per square kilometre 1.37 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.27 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1980s 259,051 current US$ per square kilometre 3.75 million current US$ per square kilometre 3.49 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1990s 378,832 current US$ per square kilometre 8.40 million current US$ per square kilometre 8.02 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2000s 552,187 current US$ per square kilometre 16.04 million current US$ per square kilometre 15.48 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2010s 778,210 current US$ per square kilometre 25.98 million current US$ per square kilometre 25.21 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2020s 931,327 current US$ per square kilometre 37.19 million current US$ per square kilometre 36.26 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, High income or Malta?
Malta, at 43.67 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.01 million current US$ per square kilometre in High income as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between High income and Malta?
42.66 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for High income and Malta?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do High income and Malta rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
High income ranks 7th and Malta ranks 5th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

High income vs Malta: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/high-income/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/high-income/malta/">High income vs Malta: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 10,484 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.