Guatemala vs Sweden: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Guatemala
959,434 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
1.02 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
61st
Sweden rank
59th

Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Sweden
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M196119922023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 1.02 million current US$ per square kilometre against 959,434 current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 63,656 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 61st and Sweden ranks 59th of 185 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 11,440 current US$ per square kilometre 43,457 current US$ per square kilometre 32,017 current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
1970s 30,250 current US$ per square kilometre 135,794 current US$ per square kilometre 105,544 current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 70,651 current US$ per square kilometre 268,854 current US$ per square kilometre 198,203 current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 117,102 current US$ per square kilometre 482,297 current US$ per square kilometre 365,195 current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 242,845 current US$ per square kilometre 662,410 current US$ per square kilometre 419,565 current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 538,181 current US$ per square kilometre 970,815 current US$ per square kilometre 432,634 current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 831,009 current US$ per square kilometre 1.02 million current US$ per square kilometre 190,988 current US$ per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Guatemala or Sweden?
Sweden, at 1.02 million current US$ per square kilometre against 959,434 current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Guatemala and Sweden?
63,656 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Sweden?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Sweden rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 61st and Sweden ranks 59th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Sweden: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/sweden/">Guatemala vs Sweden: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 10,484 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.