Ghana vs Tunisia: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Ghana
321,184 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
303,586 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ghana rank
104th
Tunisia rank
106th

Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Ghana
  • Tunisia
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ghana currently reports 321,184 current US$ per square kilometre against 303,586 current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 17,598 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ghana's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Ghana ahead.

Ghana ranks 104th and Tunisia ranks 106th of 185 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 7,635 current US$ per square kilometre 4,891 current US$ per square kilometre 2,745 current US$ per square kilometre Ghana
1970s 11,540 current US$ per square kilometre 18,863 current US$ per square kilometre 7,323 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 19,634 current US$ per square kilometre 44,478 current US$ per square kilometre 24,844 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 26,763 current US$ per square kilometre 87,562 current US$ per square kilometre 60,799 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 61,394 current US$ per square kilometre 161,363 current US$ per square kilometre 99,969 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 199,503 current US$ per square kilometre 254,900 current US$ per square kilometre 55,397 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 289,193 current US$ per square kilometre 282,646 current US$ per square kilometre 6,547 current US$ per square kilometre Ghana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Ghana or Tunisia?
Ghana, at 321,184 current US$ per square kilometre against 303,586 current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Ghana and Tunisia?
17,598 current US$ per square kilometre, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Tunisia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Ghana and Tunisia rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Ghana ranks 104th and Tunisia ranks 106th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ghana vs Tunisia: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ghana/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ghana/tunisia/">Ghana vs Tunisia: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 10,484 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.