Gambia vs Morocco: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Gambia
241,121 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Morocco
259,431 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia rank
113th
Morocco rank
111th

Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Gambia
  • Morocco
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 259,431 current US$ per square kilometre against 241,121 current US$ per square kilometre in Gambia, a difference of 18,310 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Morocco's figure about 1.1 times Gambia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Morocco ahead.

Gambia ranks 113th and Morocco ranks 111th of 185 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 1 and Morocco in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Morocco Difference Ahead
1960s 4,352 current US$ per square kilometre 6,369 current US$ per square kilometre 2,016 current US$ per square kilometre Morocco
1970s 10,475 current US$ per square kilometre 16,706 current US$ per square kilometre 6,231 current US$ per square kilometre Morocco
1980s 20,751 current US$ per square kilometre 34,382 current US$ per square kilometre 13,631 current US$ per square kilometre Morocco
1990s 71,118 current US$ per square kilometre 64,534 current US$ per square kilometre 6,585 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2000s 96,074 current US$ per square kilometre 106,384 current US$ per square kilometre 10,310 current US$ per square kilometre Morocco
2010s 137,541 current US$ per square kilometre 195,585 current US$ per square kilometre 58,044 current US$ per square kilometre Morocco
2020s 208,080 current US$ per square kilometre 240,284 current US$ per square kilometre 32,204 current US$ per square kilometre Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Gambia or Morocco?
Morocco, at 259,431 current US$ per square kilometre against 241,121 current US$ per square kilometre in Gambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Gambia and Morocco?
18,310 current US$ per square kilometre, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Morocco?
58 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2023.
How do Gambia and Morocco rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Gambia ranks 113th and Morocco ranks 111th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Morocco: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/morocco/">Gambia vs Morocco: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 10,484 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.