Euro area vs Macau, China: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Euro area
4.16 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Macau, China
632.45 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Euro area rank
1st
Macau, China rank
1st

Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Euro area
  • Macau, China
0200.0M400.0M600.0M197019962023

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 632.45 million current US$ per square kilometre against 4.16 million current US$ per square kilometre in Euro area, a difference of 628.29 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Macau, China's figure about 151.9 times Euro area's.

Across all 42 years both countries report, Macau, China has been ahead every year.

Euro area ranks 1st and Macau, China ranks 1st of 43 groups.

Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Euro area Macau, China Difference Ahead
1980s 1.03 million current US$ per square kilometre 50.80 million current US$ per square kilometre 49.77 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
1990s 1.89 million current US$ per square kilometre 162.70 million current US$ per square kilometre 160.81 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2000s 2.73 million current US$ per square kilometre 198.19 million current US$ per square kilometre 195.46 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2010s 3.51 million current US$ per square kilometre 480.85 million current US$ per square kilometre 477.34 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2020s 3.84 million current US$ per square kilometre 596.21 million current US$ per square kilometre 592.38 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Euro area or Macau, China?
Macau, China, at 632.45 million current US$ per square kilometre against 4.16 million current US$ per square kilometre in Euro area as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Euro area and Macau, China?
628.29 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Euro area and Macau, China?
42 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do Euro area and Macau, China rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Euro area ranks 1st and Macau, China ranks 1st of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Euro area vs Macau, China: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/euro-area/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/euro-area/macao-sar-china/">Euro area vs Macau, China: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 10,484 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.