Ecuador vs Pakistan: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Ecuador
384,884 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
408,418 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
94th
Pakistan rank
93rd

Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Pakistan
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 408,418 current US$ per square kilometre against 384,884 current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 23,534 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Pakistan ahead.

Ecuador ranks 94th and Pakistan ranks 93rd of 185 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Pakistan in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 6,438 current US$ per square kilometre 7,010 current US$ per square kilometre 571.36 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1970s 20,764 current US$ per square kilometre 14,347 current US$ per square kilometre 6,417 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 47,203 current US$ per square kilometre 37,074 current US$ per square kilometre 10,129 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 64,505 current US$ per square kilometre 60,460 current US$ per square kilometre 4,045 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 122,527 current US$ per square kilometre 163,546 current US$ per square kilometre 41,019 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 293,715 current US$ per square kilometre 339,305 current US$ per square kilometre 45,590 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 348,569 current US$ per square kilometre 416,886 current US$ per square kilometre 68,317 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 408,418 current US$ per square kilometre against 384,884 current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Pakistan?
23,534 current US$ per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Pakistan rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 94th and Pakistan ranks 93rd of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Pakistan: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/pakistan/">Ecuador vs Pakistan: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 10,484 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.