Ecuador vs Indonesia: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Ecuador
384,884 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Indonesia
448,359 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
94th
Indonesia rank
91st

Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Indonesia
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 448,359 current US$ per square kilometre against 384,884 current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 63,475 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1967 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 94th and Indonesia ranks 91st of 185 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 5 and Indonesia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Indonesia Difference Ahead
1960s 8,097 current US$ per square kilometre 3,737 current US$ per square kilometre 4,360 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 20,764 current US$ per square kilometre 12,369 current US$ per square kilometre 8,395 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 47,203 current US$ per square kilometre 33,784 current US$ per square kilometre 13,419 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 64,505 current US$ per square kilometre 61,403 current US$ per square kilometre 3,102 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 122,527 current US$ per square kilometre 119,408 current US$ per square kilometre 3,119 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 293,715 current US$ per square kilometre 329,394 current US$ per square kilometre 35,679 current US$ per square kilometre Indonesia
2020s 348,569 current US$ per square kilometre 416,324 current US$ per square kilometre 67,755 current US$ per square kilometre Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Indonesia?
Indonesia, at 448,359 current US$ per square kilometre against 384,884 current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Indonesia?
63,475 current US$ per square kilometre, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Indonesia?
57 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Indonesia rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 94th and Indonesia ranks 91st of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Indonesia: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/indonesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/indonesia/">Ecuador vs Indonesia: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 10,484 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.