Denmark vs Mauritius: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Denmark
6.81 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
5.94 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark rank
21st
Mauritius rank
24th

Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Denmark
  • Mauritius
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M196619942023

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 6.81 million current US$ per square kilometre against 5.94 million current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 871,110 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Denmark's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 21st and Mauritius ranks 24th of 185 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Mauritius Difference Ahead
1970s 1.11 million current US$ per square kilometre 369,982 current US$ per square kilometre 742,850 current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
1980s 1.55 million current US$ per square kilometre 548,770 current US$ per square kilometre 997,070 current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
1990s 3.03 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.37 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.65 million current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 4.58 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.65 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.94 million current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2010s 6.13 million current US$ per square kilometre 5.49 million current US$ per square kilometre 636,031 current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2020s 6.71 million current US$ per square kilometre 5.47 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.24 million current US$ per square kilometre Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Denmark or Mauritius?
Denmark, at 6.81 million current US$ per square kilometre against 5.94 million current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Denmark and Mauritius?
871,110 current US$ per square kilometre, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Mauritius?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Denmark and Mauritius rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Denmark ranks 21st and Mauritius ranks 24th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Mauritius: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/mauritius/">Denmark vs Mauritius: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 10,484 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.