Denmark vs Germany: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Denmark
6.81 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Germany
9.67 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark rank
21st
Germany rank
19th

Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Denmark
  • Germany
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M10.0M196619942023

How they compare

Germany currently reports 9.67 million current US$ per square kilometre against 6.81 million current US$ per square kilometre in Denmark, a difference of 2.85 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Germany's figure about 1.4 times Denmark's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Germany has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 21st and Germany ranks 19th of 185 countries.

Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Germany Difference Ahead
1970s 758,318 current US$ per square kilometre 1.07 million current US$ per square kilometre 308,480 current US$ per square kilometre Germany
1980s 1.55 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.23 million current US$ per square kilometre 680,933 current US$ per square kilometre Germany
1990s 3.03 million current US$ per square kilometre 4.72 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.69 million current US$ per square kilometre Germany
2000s 4.58 million current US$ per square kilometre 6.08 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.49 million current US$ per square kilometre Germany
2010s 6.13 million current US$ per square kilometre 7.88 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.75 million current US$ per square kilometre Germany
2020s 6.71 million current US$ per square kilometre 8.96 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.24 million current US$ per square kilometre Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Denmark or Germany?
Germany, at 9.67 million current US$ per square kilometre against 6.81 million current US$ per square kilometre in Denmark as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Denmark and Germany?
2.85 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Germany?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Denmark and Germany rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Denmark ranks 21st and Germany ranks 19th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Germany: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/germany/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/germany/">Denmark vs Germany: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 10,484 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.