Czechia vs Palestine, State of: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Czechia
2.99 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Palestine, State of
3.60 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Czechia rank
33rd
Palestine, State of rank
31st

Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Czechia
  • Palestine, State of
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M199320082023

How they compare

Palestine, State of currently reports 3.60 million current US$ per square kilometre against 2.99 million current US$ per square kilometre in Czechia, a difference of 607,440 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Palestine, State of's figure about 1.2 times Czechia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Palestine, State of ahead.

Czechia ranks 33rd and Palestine, State of ranks 31st of 185 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Palestine, State of in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Palestine, State of Difference Ahead
1990s 561,971 current US$ per square kilometre 711,963 current US$ per square kilometre 149,992 current US$ per square kilometre Palestine, State of
2000s 1.20 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.09 million current US$ per square kilometre 115,798 current US$ per square kilometre Czechia
2010s 1.95 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.62 million current US$ per square kilometre 668,394 current US$ per square kilometre Palestine, State of
2020s 2.61 million current US$ per square kilometre 3.42 million current US$ per square kilometre 810,130 current US$ per square kilometre Palestine, State of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Czechia or Palestine, State of?
Palestine, State of, at 3.60 million current US$ per square kilometre against 2.99 million current US$ per square kilometre in Czechia as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Czechia and Palestine, State of?
607,440 current US$ per square kilometre, with Palestine, State of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Palestine, State of?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Czechia and Palestine, State of rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Czechia ranks 33rd and Palestine, State of ranks 31st of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Palestine, State of: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/czechia/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/czechia/west-bank-and-gaza/">Czechia vs Palestine, State of: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 10,484 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.