Cyprus vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Cyprus
2.90 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
79,461 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cyprus rank
34th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
36th

Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Cyprus
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
01.0M2.0M3.0M196519942023

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 2.90 million current US$ per square kilometre against 79,461 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 2.82 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cyprus's figure about 36.5 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 49 years both countries report, Cyprus has been ahead every year.

Cyprus ranks 34th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 36th of 185 countries.

Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1970s 77,050 current US$ per square kilometre 6,812 current US$ per square kilometre 70,238 current US$ per square kilometre Cyprus
1980s 243,542 current US$ per square kilometre 12,253 current US$ per square kilometre 231,290 current US$ per square kilometre Cyprus
1990s 694,019 current US$ per square kilometre 19,214 current US$ per square kilometre 674,806 current US$ per square kilometre Cyprus
2000s 1.56 million current US$ per square kilometre 32,652 current US$ per square kilometre 1.53 million current US$ per square kilometre Cyprus
2010s 2.17 million current US$ per square kilometre 61,094 current US$ per square kilometre 2.11 million current US$ per square kilometre Cyprus
2020s 2.55 million current US$ per square kilometre 73,709 current US$ per square kilometre 2.47 million current US$ per square kilometre Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Cyprus or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Cyprus, at 2.90 million current US$ per square kilometre against 79,461 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Cyprus and Sub-Saharan Africa?
2.82 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Sub-Saharan Africa?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Cyprus and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Cyprus ranks 34th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 36th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cyprus/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cyprus/sub-saharan-africa/">Cyprus vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 10,484 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.