Congo vs Madagascar: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Congo
25,666 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Madagascar
24,229 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
164th
Madagascar rank
167th

Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Madagascar
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 25,666 current US$ per square kilometre against 24,229 current US$ per square kilometre in Madagascar, a difference of 1,437 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Madagascar's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Madagascar ahead.

Congo ranks 164th and Madagascar ranks 167th of 185 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Madagascar in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Madagascar Difference Ahead
1960s 578.66 current US$ per square kilometre 1,448 current US$ per square kilometre 869.79 current US$ per square kilometre Madagascar
1970s 1,644 current US$ per square kilometre 3,344 current US$ per square kilometre 1,700 current US$ per square kilometre Madagascar
1980s 4,196 current US$ per square kilometre 5,278 current US$ per square kilometre 1,083 current US$ per square kilometre Madagascar
1990s 4,196 current US$ per square kilometre 5,694 current US$ per square kilometre 1,499 current US$ per square kilometre Madagascar
2000s 8,425 current US$ per square kilometre 10,204 current US$ per square kilometre 1,779 current US$ per square kilometre Madagascar
2010s 20,114 current US$ per square kilometre 18,488 current US$ per square kilometre 1,627 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 23,823 current US$ per square kilometre 22,995 current US$ per square kilometre 827.95 current US$ per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Congo or Madagascar?
Congo, at 25,666 current US$ per square kilometre against 24,229 current US$ per square kilometre in Madagascar as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Congo and Madagascar?
1,437 current US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Madagascar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Madagascar rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 164th and Madagascar ranks 167th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Madagascar: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/madagascar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/madagascar/">Congo vs Madagascar: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 10,484 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.