Cameroon vs Zimbabwe: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Cameroon
87,672 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
89,050 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cameroon rank
145th
Zimbabwe rank
143rd

Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Cameroon
  • Zimbabwe
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 89,050 current US$ per square kilometre against 87,672 current US$ per square kilometre in Cameroon, a difference of 1,378 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Cameroon ranks 145th and Zimbabwe ranks 143rd of 185 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 1,782 current US$ per square kilometre 3,101 current US$ per square kilometre 1,320 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 4,684 current US$ per square kilometre 7,732 current US$ per square kilometre 3,048 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 14,648 current US$ per square kilometre 15,763 current US$ per square kilometre 1,115 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 19,590 current US$ per square kilometre 16,118 current US$ per square kilometre 3,472 current US$ per square kilometre Cameroon
2000s 32,893 current US$ per square kilometre 16,257 current US$ per square kilometre 16,636 current US$ per square kilometre Cameroon
2010s 60,440 current US$ per square kilometre 61,328 current US$ per square kilometre 888.07 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 80,344 current US$ per square kilometre 92,711 current US$ per square kilometre 12,367 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Cameroon or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 89,050 current US$ per square kilometre against 87,672 current US$ per square kilometre in Cameroon as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Cameroon and Zimbabwe?
1,378 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Zimbabwe?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Cameroon and Zimbabwe rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Cameroon ranks 145th and Zimbabwe ranks 143rd of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs Zimbabwe: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/zimbabwe/">Cameroon vs Zimbabwe: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 10,484 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.