Burkina Faso vs Solomon Islands: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Burkina Faso
62,456 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Solomon Islands
56,432 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
154th
Solomon Islands rank
157th

Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Solomon Islands
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 62,456 current US$ per square kilometre against 56,432 current US$ per square kilometre in Solomon Islands, a difference of 6,024 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.1 times Solomon Islands's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Solomon Islands ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 154th and Solomon Islands ranks 157th of 185 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Solomon Islands in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1980s 7,028 current US$ per square kilometre 13,053 current US$ per square kilometre 6,025 current US$ per square kilometre Solomon Islands
1990s 9,522 current US$ per square kilometre 16,406 current US$ per square kilometre 6,884 current US$ per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2000s 20,842 current US$ per square kilometre 19,180 current US$ per square kilometre 1,662 current US$ per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2010s 41,018 current US$ per square kilometre 42,293 current US$ per square kilometre 1,274 current US$ per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2020s 58,019 current US$ per square kilometre 51,355 current US$ per square kilometre 6,664 current US$ per square kilometre Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Burkina Faso or Solomon Islands?
Burkina Faso, at 62,456 current US$ per square kilometre against 56,432 current US$ per square kilometre in Solomon Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Burkina Faso and Solomon Islands?
6,024 current US$ per square kilometre, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Solomon Islands?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Solomon Islands rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Burkina Faso ranks 154th and Solomon Islands ranks 157th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Solomon Islands: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/solomon-islands/">Burkina Faso vs Solomon Islands: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 10,484 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.