Brazil vs Gambia: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Brazil
214,880 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia
241,121 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
116th
Gambia rank
113th

Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Gambia
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k196119922023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 241,121 current US$ per square kilometre against 214,880 current US$ per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 26,241 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Gambia's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Gambia ahead.

Brazil ranks 116th and Gambia ranks 113th of 185 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 3 and Gambia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Gambia Difference Ahead
1960s 3,099 current US$ per square kilometre 4,352 current US$ per square kilometre 1,253 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
1970s 11,454 current US$ per square kilometre 10,475 current US$ per square kilometre 978.91 current US$ per square kilometre Brazil
1980s 24,711 current US$ per square kilometre 20,751 current US$ per square kilometre 3,961 current US$ per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 58,417 current US$ per square kilometre 71,118 current US$ per square kilometre 12,702 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2000s 93,211 current US$ per square kilometre 96,074 current US$ per square kilometre 2,863 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2010s 212,808 current US$ per square kilometre 137,541 current US$ per square kilometre 75,267 current US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 177,987 current US$ per square kilometre 208,080 current US$ per square kilometre 30,093 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Brazil or Gambia?
Gambia, at 241,121 current US$ per square kilometre against 214,880 current US$ per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Brazil and Gambia?
26,241 current US$ per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Gambia?
58 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Gambia rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 116th and Gambia ranks 113th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Gambia: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/gambia-the/">Brazil vs Gambia: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 10,484 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.