Bosnia and Herzegovina vs North Macedonia: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Bosnia and Herzegovina
478,762 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
North Macedonia
524,140 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
90th
North Macedonia rank
88th

Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • North Macedonia
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k199220072023

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 524,140 current US$ per square kilometre against 478,762 current US$ per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 45,378 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was North Macedonia ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 90th and North Macedonia ranks 88th of 185 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina North Macedonia Difference Ahead
2000s 252,523 current US$ per square kilometre 238,699 current US$ per square kilometre 13,824 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 368,749 current US$ per square kilometre 372,204 current US$ per square kilometre 3,455 current US$ per square kilometre North Macedonia
2020s 420,957 current US$ per square kilometre 465,292 current US$ per square kilometre 44,336 current US$ per square kilometre North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Bosnia and Herzegovina or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at 524,140 current US$ per square kilometre against 478,762 current US$ per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Bosnia and Herzegovina and North Macedonia?
45,378 current US$ per square kilometre, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and North Macedonia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and North Macedonia rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 90th and North Macedonia ranks 88th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs North Macedonia: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/north-macedonia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs North Macedonia: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 10,484 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.