Bangladesh vs Portugal: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Bangladesh
2.50 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Portugal
2.50 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
37th
Portugal rank
36th

Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Portugal
01.0M2.0M3.0M196119922023

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 2.50 million current US$ per square kilometre against 2.50 million current US$ per square kilometre in Bangladesh, a difference of 1,140 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Portugal ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 37th and Portugal ranks 36th of 185 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Portugal Difference Ahead
1970s 84,994 current US$ per square kilometre 153,663 current US$ per square kilometre 68,669 current US$ per square kilometre Portugal
1980s 145,658 current US$ per square kilometre 329,092 current US$ per square kilometre 183,434 current US$ per square kilometre Portugal
1990s 255,703 current US$ per square kilometre 968,441 current US$ per square kilometre 712,738 current US$ per square kilometre Portugal
2000s 428,844 current US$ per square kilometre 1.74 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.31 million current US$ per square kilometre Portugal
2010s 1.23 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.06 million current US$ per square kilometre 833,430 current US$ per square kilometre Portugal
2020s 2.41 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.28 million current US$ per square kilometre 123,232 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Bangladesh or Portugal?
Portugal, at 2.50 million current US$ per square kilometre against 2.50 million current US$ per square kilometre in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Bangladesh and Portugal?
1,140 current US$ per square kilometre, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Portugal?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Portugal rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Bangladesh ranks 37th and Portugal ranks 36th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Portugal: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/portugal/">Bangladesh vs Portugal: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 10,484 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.