Bahamas vs Sri Lanka: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Bahamas
1.17 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
1.06 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
55th
Sri Lanka rank
57th

Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bahamas
  • Sri Lanka
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M196119922023

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 1.17 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.06 million current US$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 108,720 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bahamas's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Bahamas ranks 55th and Sri Lanka ranks 57th of 185 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 5 and Sri Lanka in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1970s 67,026 current US$ per square kilometre 44,907 current US$ per square kilometre 22,119 current US$ per square kilometre Bahamas
1980s 155,983 current US$ per square kilometre 73,570 current US$ per square kilometre 82,413 current US$ per square kilometre Bahamas
1990s 325,492 current US$ per square kilometre 159,797 current US$ per square kilometre 165,695 current US$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2000s 657,629 current US$ per square kilometre 340,045 current US$ per square kilometre 317,585 current US$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2010s 942,254 current US$ per square kilometre 1.02 million current US$ per square kilometre 78,852 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 1.03 million current US$ per square kilometre 995,923 current US$ per square kilometre 29,657 current US$ per square kilometre Bahamas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Bahamas or Sri Lanka?
Bahamas, at 1.17 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.06 million current US$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Bahamas and Sri Lanka?
108,720 current US$ per square kilometre, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Sri Lanka?
41 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Sri Lanka rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Bahamas ranks 55th and Sri Lanka ranks 57th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Sri Lanka: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/sri-lanka/">Bahamas vs Sri Lanka: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 10,484 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.