Australia vs Kenya: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Australia
161,830 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kenya
164,211 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
126th
Kenya rank
125th

Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Kenya
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 164,211 current US$ per square kilometre against 161,830 current US$ per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 2,381 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 126th and Kenya ranks 125th of 185 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 6 and Kenya in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Kenya Difference Ahead
1960s 2,396 current US$ per square kilometre 1,561 current US$ per square kilometre 834.22 current US$ per square kilometre Australia
1970s 8,068 current US$ per square kilometre 4,743 current US$ per square kilometre 3,325 current US$ per square kilometre Australia
1980s 19,171 current US$ per square kilometre 10,044 current US$ per square kilometre 9,128 current US$ per square kilometre Australia
1990s 35,448 current US$ per square kilometre 15,195 current US$ per square kilometre 20,253 current US$ per square kilometre Australia
2000s 63,869 current US$ per square kilometre 35,940 current US$ per square kilometre 27,929 current US$ per square kilometre Australia
2010s 134,504 current US$ per square kilometre 108,085 current US$ per square kilometre 26,419 current US$ per square kilometre Australia
2020s 149,002 current US$ per square kilometre 164,251 current US$ per square kilometre 15,249 current US$ per square kilometre Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Australia or Kenya?
Kenya, at 164,211 current US$ per square kilometre against 161,830 current US$ per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Australia and Kenya?
2,381 current US$ per square kilometre, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Kenya?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Kenya rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 126th and Kenya ranks 125th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Kenya: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/kenya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/kenya/">Australia vs Kenya: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 10,484 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.