Australia vs Canada: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Australia
161,830 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada
190,600 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
126th
Canada rank
123rd

Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Canada
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119922023

How they compare

Canada currently reports 190,600 current US$ per square kilometre against 161,830 current US$ per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 28,770 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Canada's figure about 1.2 times Australia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 126th and Canada ranks 123rd of 185 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Canada Difference Ahead
1960s 2,396 current US$ per square kilometre 4,845 current US$ per square kilometre 2,450 current US$ per square kilometre Canada
1970s 8,068 current US$ per square kilometre 14,054 current US$ per square kilometre 5,986 current US$ per square kilometre Canada
1980s 19,171 current US$ per square kilometre 32,681 current US$ per square kilometre 13,509 current US$ per square kilometre Canada
1990s 35,448 current US$ per square kilometre 54,039 current US$ per square kilometre 18,591 current US$ per square kilometre Canada
2000s 63,869 current US$ per square kilometre 92,340 current US$ per square kilometre 28,472 current US$ per square kilometre Canada
2010s 134,504 current US$ per square kilometre 148,457 current US$ per square kilometre 13,953 current US$ per square kilometre Canada
2020s 149,002 current US$ per square kilometre 174,468 current US$ per square kilometre 25,466 current US$ per square kilometre Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Australia or Canada?
Canada, at 190,600 current US$ per square kilometre against 161,830 current US$ per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Australia and Canada?
28,770 current US$ per square kilometre, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Canada?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Canada rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 126th and Canada ranks 123rd of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Canada: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/canada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/canada/">Australia vs Canada: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 10,484 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.