Africa Eastern and Southern vs Poland: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Africa Eastern and Southern
65,097 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Poland
2.03 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Africa Eastern and Southern rank
40th
Poland rank
42nd

Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Africa Eastern and Southern
  • Poland
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M198220022023

How they compare

Poland currently reports 2.03 million current US$ per square kilometre against 65,097 current US$ per square kilometre in Africa Eastern and Southern, a difference of 1.97 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Poland's figure about 31.2 times Africa Eastern and Southern's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 40th and Poland ranks 42nd of 43 groups.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Africa Eastern and Southern Poland Difference Ahead
1990s 19,294 current US$ per square kilometre 420,625 current US$ per square kilometre 401,331 current US$ per square kilometre Poland
2000s 30,582 current US$ per square kilometre 820,678 current US$ per square kilometre 790,096 current US$ per square kilometre Poland
2010s 53,379 current US$ per square kilometre 1.34 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.29 million current US$ per square kilometre Poland
2020s 60,930 current US$ per square kilometre 1.74 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.68 million current US$ per square kilometre Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Africa Eastern and Southern or Poland?
Poland, at 2.03 million current US$ per square kilometre against 65,097 current US$ per square kilometre in Africa Eastern and Southern as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Africa Eastern and Southern and Poland?
1.97 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Africa Eastern and Southern and Poland?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Africa Eastern and Southern and Poland rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 40th and Poland ranks 42nd of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Africa Eastern and Southern vs Poland: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/africa-eastern-and-southern/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/africa-eastern-and-southern/poland/">Africa Eastern and Southern vs Poland: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 10,484 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.