Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square

Tanzania, United Republic of
51,670 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
47,951 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
146th
Zimbabwe rank
149th

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Tanzania, United Republic of
  • Zimbabwe
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k60.0k199020062023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 51,670 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 47,951 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 3,719 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 146th and Zimbabwe ranks 149th of 169 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Tanzania, United Republic of averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tanzania, United Republic of Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 26,501 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 22,079 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,422 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 38,079 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 46,882 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,803 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 48,791 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 43,820 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,971 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square, Tanzania, United Republic of or Zimbabwe?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 51,670 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 47,951 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square between Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe?
3,719 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 146th and Zimbabwe ranks 149th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/tanzania/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/tanzania/zimbabwe/">Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 8,516 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.