Slovenia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square

Slovenia
1.92 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
73,341 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Slovenia rank
36th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
35th

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Slovenia
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M199220072023

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 1.92 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 73,341 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 1.84 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Slovenia's figure about 26.1 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.

Slovenia ranks 36th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 35th of 169 countries.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Slovenia Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 1.07 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 30,792 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.03 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Slovenia
2000s 1.37 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 42,243 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.33 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Slovenia
2010s 1.59 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 58,225 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.53 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Slovenia
2020s 1.84 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 69,437 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.77 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square, Slovenia or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Slovenia, at 1.92 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 73,341 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square between Slovenia and Sub-Saharan Africa?
1.84 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Sub-Saharan Africa?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Slovenia and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Slovenia ranks 36th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 35th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Slovenia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/slovenia/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/slovenia/sub-saharan-africa/">Slovenia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 8,516 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.