Russian Federation vs Tajikistan: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square

Russian Federation
70,442 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tajikistan
84,149 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Russian Federation rank
138th
Tajikistan rank
135th

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Russian Federation
  • Tajikistan
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k199220072023

How they compare

Tajikistan currently reports 84,149 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 70,442 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Russian Federation, a difference of 13,707 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.2 times Russian Federation's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Tajikistan ahead.

Russian Federation ranks 138th and Tajikistan ranks 135th of 169 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Russian Federation averaged higher in 3 and Tajikistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russian Federation Tajikistan Difference Ahead
1990s 27,766 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 26,154 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,612 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Russian Federation
2000s 40,888 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 37,956 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,933 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Russian Federation
2010s 60,132 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 55,400 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,731 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Russian Federation
2020s 65,925 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 73,879 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,954 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tajikistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square, Russian Federation or Tajikistan?
Tajikistan, at 84,149 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 70,442 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Russian Federation as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square between Russian Federation and Tajikistan?
13,707 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Tajikistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Tajikistan?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Russian Federation and Tajikistan rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Russian Federation ranks 138th and Tajikistan ranks 135th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Russian Federation vs Tajikistan: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/russian-federation/tajikistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/russian-federation/tajikistan/">Russian Federation vs Tajikistan: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 8,516 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.