Portugal vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square

Portugal
2.10 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
73,341 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Portugal rank
34th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
35th

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Portugal
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M197019962023

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 2.10 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 73,341 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 2.02 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Portugal's figure about 28.6 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.

Portugal ranks 34th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 35th of 169 countries.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Portugal Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 1.48 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 30,792 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.45 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Portugal
2000s 1.84 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 42,243 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.79 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Portugal
2010s 1.85 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 58,225 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.80 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Portugal
2020s 1.99 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 69,437 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.92 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square, Portugal or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Portugal, at 2.10 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 73,341 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square between Portugal and Sub-Saharan Africa?
2.02 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Sub-Saharan Africa?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Portugal and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Portugal ranks 34th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 35th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Portugal vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/portugal/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/portugal/sub-saharan-africa/">Portugal vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 8,516 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.