Malaysia vs Norway: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square

Malaysia
904,185 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
882,247 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia rank
55th
Norway rank
57th

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Malaysia
  • Norway
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M196119922023

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 904,185 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 882,247 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 21,938 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Norway ahead.

Malaysia ranks 55th and Norway ranks 57th of 169 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Norway Difference Ahead
1970s 54,109 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 217,172 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 163,063 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
1980s 99,528 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 295,367 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 195,839 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
1990s 177,677 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 375,958 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 198,280 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2000s 314,216 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 534,239 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 220,023 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2010s 602,374 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 728,457 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 126,083 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2020s 830,242 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 842,882 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 12,640 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square, Malaysia or Norway?
Malaysia, at 904,185 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 882,247 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square between Malaysia and Norway?
21,938 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Norway?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Malaysia and Norway rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Malaysia ranks 55th and Norway ranks 57th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Norway: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/malaysia/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/malaysia/norway/">Malaysia vs Norway: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 8,516 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.