Late-demographic dividend vs Qatar: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square

Late-demographic dividend
371,999 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Qatar
5.99 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Late-demographic dividend rank
18th
Qatar rank
20th

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Late-demographic dividend
  • Qatar
02.0M4.0M6.0M199520092023

How they compare

Qatar currently reports 5.99 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 371,999 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 5.62 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Qatar's figure about 16.1 times Late-demographic dividend's.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Qatar has been ahead every year.

Late-demographic dividend ranks 18th and Qatar ranks 20th of 42 groups.

Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Late-demographic dividend Qatar Difference Ahead
1990s 94,157 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 991,642 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 897,485 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Qatar
2000s 141,730 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.82 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.68 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Qatar
2010s 256,390 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5.31 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5.06 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Qatar
2020s 313,669 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5.99 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5.68 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Qatar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square, Late-demographic dividend or Qatar?
Qatar, at 5.99 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 371,999 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Late-demographic dividend as of 2020.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square between Late-demographic dividend and Qatar?
5.62 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Qatar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Late-demographic dividend and Qatar?
25 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2020.
How do Late-demographic dividend and Qatar rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Late-demographic dividend ranks 18th and Qatar ranks 20th of 42 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Late-demographic dividend vs Qatar: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/late-demographic-dividend/qatar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/late-demographic-dividend/qatar/">Late-demographic dividend vs Qatar: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 8,516 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.