Kazakhstan vs Russian Federation: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square

Kazakhstan
58,779 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Russian Federation
70,442 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
140th
Russian Federation rank
138th

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Russian Federation
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k199220072023

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 70,442 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 58,779 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 11,663 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.2 times Kazakhstan's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.

Kazakhstan ranks 140th and Russian Federation ranks 138th of 169 countries.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 16,883 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 27,869 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 10,986 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Russian Federation
2000s 21,175 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 40,888 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 19,713 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Russian Federation
2010s 42,623 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 60,132 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 17,509 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Russian Federation
2020s 54,074 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 65,925 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11,851 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square, Kazakhstan or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 70,442 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 58,779 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square between Kazakhstan and Russian Federation?
11,663 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Russian Federation?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Russian Federation rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Kazakhstan ranks 140th and Russian Federation ranks 138th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Russian Federation: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/russian-federation/">Kazakhstan vs Russian Federation: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 8,516 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.