Ireland vs Seychelles: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square

Ireland
2.68 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Seychelles
3.77 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ireland rank
31st
Seychelles rank
28th

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Ireland
  • Seychelles
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M197019962023

How they compare

Seychelles currently reports 3.77 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 2.68 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Ireland, a difference of 1.09 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Seychelles's figure about 1.4 times Ireland's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Seychelles ahead.

Ireland ranks 31st and Seychelles ranks 28th of 169 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Ireland averaged higher in 1 and Seychelles in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ireland Seychelles Difference Ahead
1980s 734,784 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 871,043 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 136,259 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Seychelles
1990s 984,146 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.54 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 559,196 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Seychelles
2000s 1.71 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.69 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 22,281 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Ireland
2010s 1.97 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2.72 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 753,385 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Seychelles
2020s 2.44 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3.77 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.33 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Seychelles

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square, Ireland or Seychelles?
Seychelles, at 3.77 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 2.68 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Ireland as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square between Ireland and Seychelles?
1.09 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Seychelles ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Seychelles?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Ireland and Seychelles rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Ireland ranks 31st and Seychelles ranks 28th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ireland vs Seychelles: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/ireland/seychelles/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/ireland/seychelles/">Ireland vs Seychelles: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 8,516 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.