India vs Norway: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square

India
749,784 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
882,247 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
India rank
60th
Norway rank
57th

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • India
  • Norway
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119922023

How they compare

Norway currently reports 882,247 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 749,784 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in India, a difference of 132,463 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.2 times India's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

India ranks 60th and Norway ranks 57th of 169 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Norway Difference Ahead
1970s 66,252 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 217,172 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 150,920 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
1980s 100,811 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 295,367 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 194,556 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
1990s 156,833 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 375,958 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 219,125 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2000s 262,638 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 534,239 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 271,601 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2010s 486,032 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 728,457 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 242,424 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2020s 685,002 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 842,882 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 157,880 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square, India or Norway?
Norway, at 882,247 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 749,784 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in India as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square between India and Norway?
132,463 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Norway?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do India and Norway rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square?
India ranks 60th and Norway ranks 57th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Norway: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/india/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/india/norway/">India vs Norway: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 8,516 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.