Dominican Republic vs Slovakia: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square

Dominican Republic
1.64 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Slovakia
1.59 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominican Republic rank
39th
Slovakia rank
40th

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Slovakia
0500.0k1.0M1.5M196119922023

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 1.64 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1.59 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Slovakia, a difference of 53,800 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Slovakia ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 39th and Slovakia ranks 40th of 169 countries.

Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Slovakia Difference Ahead
1990s 505,380 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 785,830 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 280,450 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Slovakia
2000s 724,876 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.04 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 319,194 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Slovakia
2010s 1.18 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.36 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 173,839 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Slovakia
2020s 1.54 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.59 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 47,082 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Slovakia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square, Dominican Republic or Slovakia?
Dominican Republic, at 1.64 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1.59 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Slovakia as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square between Dominican Republic and Slovakia?
53,800 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Slovakia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Dominican Republic and Slovakia rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Dominican Republic ranks 39th and Slovakia ranks 40th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Slovakia: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/dominican-republic/slovak-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/dominican-republic/slovak-republic/">Dominican Republic vs Slovakia: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 8,516 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.