Cyprus vs Ireland: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square

Cyprus
2.56 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ireland
2.68 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cyprus rank
32nd
Ireland rank
31st

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Cyprus
  • Ireland
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M2.5M197019962023

How they compare

Ireland currently reports 2.68 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 2.56 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Cyprus, a difference of 116,960 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Ireland ahead.

Cyprus ranks 32nd and Ireland ranks 31st of 169 countries.

Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Ireland Difference Ahead
1970s 301,363 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 627,229 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 325,866 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Ireland
1980s 497,491 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 734,784 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 237,293 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Ireland
1990s 943,866 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 984,146 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 40,280 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Ireland
2000s 1.61 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.71 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 96,972 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Ireland
2010s 1.93 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.97 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 38,458 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Ireland
2020s 2.35 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2.44 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 93,922 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square, Cyprus or Ireland?
Ireland, at 2.68 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 2.56 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Cyprus as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square between Cyprus and Ireland?
116,960 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Ireland?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Cyprus and Ireland rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Cyprus ranks 32nd and Ireland ranks 31st of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs Ireland: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cyprus/ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cyprus/ireland/">Cyprus vs Ireland: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 8,516 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.