Cuba vs New Zealand: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square

Cuba
737,074 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
675,873 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
62nd
New Zealand rank
64th

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Cuba
  • New Zealand
200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k197019962023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 737,074 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 675,873 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 61,201 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 62nd and New Zealand ranks 64th of 169 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 263,808 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 198,163 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 65,645 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 434,677 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 224,949 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 209,728 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 372,520 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 274,156 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 98,364 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 497,576 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 382,332 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 115,244 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 712,298 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 514,395 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 197,903 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 736,597 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 656,502 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 80,095 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square, Cuba or New Zealand?
Cuba, at 737,074 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 675,873 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square between Cuba and New Zealand?
61,201 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and New Zealand?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Cuba and New Zealand rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Cuba ranks 62nd and New Zealand ranks 64th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs New Zealand: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/new-zealand/">Cuba vs New Zealand: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 8,516 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.