Congo vs Mali: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square

Congo
17,528 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mali
15,800 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
161st
Mali rank
163rd

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Congo
  • Mali
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 17,528 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 15,800 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Mali, a difference of 1,728 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Mali's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1967 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 161st and Mali ranks 163rd of 169 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Mali Difference Ahead
1960s 2,467 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 184.07 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,282 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo
1970s 3,054 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 456.96 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,597 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo
1980s 5,444 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,505 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 938.49 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo
1990s 6,430 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,235 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,196 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo
2000s 11,391 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,494 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,897 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo
2010s 18,161 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11,149 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,012 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 16,342 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,869 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,473 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square, Congo or Mali?
Congo, at 17,528 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 15,800 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Mali as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square between Congo and Mali?
1,728 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Mali?
57 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 2023.
How do Congo and Mali rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Congo ranks 161st and Mali ranks 163rd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Mali: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/mali/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/mali/">Congo vs Mali: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 8,516 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.