Central Europe and the Baltics vs Malta: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square

Central Europe and the Baltics
1.12 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
37.20 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
5th
Malta rank
5th

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Malta
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M199520092023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 37.20 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1.12 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 36.08 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 33.3 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 5th and Malta ranks 5th of 42 groups.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Malta Difference Ahead
2000s 694,743 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 17.79 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 17.09 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Malta
2010s 885,597 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 23.74 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 22.85 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Malta
2020s 1.08 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 32.91 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 31.83 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square, Central Europe and the Baltics or Malta?
Malta, at 37.20 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1.12 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square between Central Europe and the Baltics and Malta?
36.08 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Malta?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Malta rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 5th and Malta ranks 5th of 42 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Malta: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/malta/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Malta: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 8,516 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.