Central African Republic vs Mauritania: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square

Central African Republic
4,009 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania
6,502 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
169th
Mauritania rank
167th

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Mauritania
2.0k4.0k6.0k196419932023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 6,502 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 4,009 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Central African Republic, a difference of 2,493 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.6 times Central African Republic's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 169th and Mauritania ranks 167th of 169 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Mauritania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Mauritania Difference Ahead
2000s 4,210 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,778 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 432.25 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Central African Republic
2010s 3,410 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,637 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,227 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mauritania
2020s 4,048 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,032 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,984 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square, Central African Republic or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 6,502 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 4,009 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square between Central African Republic and Mauritania?
2,493 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Mauritania?
15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Mauritania rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Central African Republic ranks 169th and Mauritania ranks 167th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Mauritania: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/mauritania/">Central African Republic vs Mauritania: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 8,516 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.