Burkina Faso vs Guinea-Bissau: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square

Burkina Faso
52,960 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau
55,852 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
145th
Guinea-Bissau rank
142nd

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Guinea-Bissau
020.0k40.0k60.0k196519942023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 55,852 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 52,960 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Burkina Faso, a difference of 2,892 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Burkina Faso's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 145th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 142nd of 169 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Guinea-Bissau in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1990s 16,208 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 24,045 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,838 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2000s 22,698 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 26,501 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,804 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2010s 37,256 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 36,992 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 264.86 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2020s 49,648 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 53,066 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,417 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square, Burkina Faso or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 55,852 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 52,960 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square between Burkina Faso and Guinea-Bissau?
2,892 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Guinea-Bissau?
27 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Burkina Faso ranks 145th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 142nd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Guinea-Bissau: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/guinea-bissau/">Burkina Faso vs Guinea-Bissau: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 8,516 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.