Botswana vs Gabon: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square

Botswana
24,195 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gabon
28,464 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
155th
Gabon rank
153rd

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Botswana
  • Gabon
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119922023

How they compare

Gabon currently reports 28,464 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 24,195 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 4,269 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Gabon's figure about 1.2 times Botswana's.

Across all 49 years both countries report, Gabon has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 155th and Gabon ranks 153rd of 169 countries.

Gabon has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Gabon Difference Ahead
1970s 1,792 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9,573 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,781 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Gabon
1980s 3,052 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,127 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 10,075 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Gabon
1990s 7,160 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,219 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,059 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Gabon
2000s 10,462 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 17,259 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,797 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Gabon
2010s 17,977 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 27,417 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9,440 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Gabon
2020s 22,772 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 28,323 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,551 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Gabon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square, Botswana or Gabon?
Gabon, at 28,464 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 24,195 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square between Botswana and Gabon?
4,269 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Gabon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Gabon?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Gabon rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Botswana ranks 155th and Gabon ranks 153rd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Gabon: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/gabon/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/gabon/">Botswana vs Gabon: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 8,516 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.