Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Zimbabwe: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square

Bolivia, Plurinational State of
31,089 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
47,951 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank
151st
Zimbabwe rank
149th

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Bolivia, Plurinational State of
  • Zimbabwe
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 47,951 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 31,089 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Bolivia, Plurinational State of, a difference of 16,862 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.5 times Bolivia, Plurinational State of's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 151st and Zimbabwe ranks 149th of 169 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia, Plurinational State of Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 17,705 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 22,079 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,374 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 25,154 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 46,882 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 21,727 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 29,238 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 43,820 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,582 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square, Bolivia, Plurinational State of or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 47,951 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 31,089 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Bolivia, Plurinational State of as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Zimbabwe?
16,862 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Zimbabwe?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Zimbabwe rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 151st and Zimbabwe ranks 149th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Zimbabwe: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/zimbabwe/">Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Zimbabwe: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 8,516 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.