Bangladesh vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square

Bangladesh
1.81 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
73,341 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
38th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
35th

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M196119922023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 1.81 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 73,341 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 1.74 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 24.7 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 38th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 35th of 169 countries.

Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 502,753 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 30,792 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 471,961 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2000s 701,398 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 42,243 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 659,156 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2010s 1.16 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 58,225 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.10 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2020s 1.68 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 69,437 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.61 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square, Bangladesh or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Bangladesh, at 1.81 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 73,341 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square between Bangladesh and Sub-Saharan Africa?
1.74 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Sub-Saharan Africa?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Bangladesh ranks 38th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 35th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/sub-saharan-africa/">Bangladesh vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 8,516 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.